ecomii politics blog
Home  > ecomii blogs  > ecomii politics blog > New Jersey’s Lisa Jackson to head EPA

ecomii healthy living

New Jersey’s Lisa Jackson to head EPA

By Robert Cowin
December 17, 2008
File under: Cabinet, Environmental Policy

epa.jpg

What is the deal with EPA Directors being from New Jersey?  Is it a prerequisite or something?  We had Christie Todd Whitman (what a nightmare), and now we have Lisa Jackson.  Both were former heads of the New Jersey EPA, and while I would never compare Jackson’s record to Whitman’s, it’s clear that many New Jersey environmental groups regard her as being too lenient on polluters.  Having lived in and worked on environmental issues in New Jersey, let me say that when it comes to issues like climate change the State of New Jersey has its act together, but when it comes to issues like toxics, New Jersey is the poster child for ineptitude.  New Jersey has way too many untreated superfund sites, and many feel not enough was done to fix the problem under Jackson’s watch.

Lisa Jackson is currently the Chief of Staff for Governor John Corzine, and has held almost every position of note in the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.  Her career speaks to a lifetime of work on environmental issues, and while the State of New Jersey has made some good progress in that regard, it’s not a place where ecological sensitivity trumps industry, nor has it ever been.  Perhaps you’ve heard the jokes about New Jersey’s toxic reputation.  Unfortunately, I can’t say that they are unwarranted.

Jackson has on several occasions mentioned the plight of poor people who are forced to bare the brunt of dangerous health issues because they can’t afford to live in places free from environmental hazards, and yet, take a train to Newark on a windy day.  Take a deep breath, and take a strong whiff, and tell me that New Jersey air quality isn’t still a huge problem for those who live there.  What has she done to improve the quality of life for the people she claims to be fighting for?  Why, for example, have only 22 of the 115 toxic superfund sites been cleaned up?  Clearly it’s not fair to blame Jackson for all the environmental shortcomings of the State, but one cannot properly evaluate her career without also measuring New Jersey’s environmental progress considering the many prominent roles she has played in formulating New Jersey environmental policy.

She has a Masters in chemical engineering from Princeton University and her intellect is not in doubt.  But why does it have to be a government insider?  Why does it have to be an establishment candidate?  Why not appoint a person from one of the many quality environmental non-profit organizations around the country?  My point being, Jackson is far from a trailblazer for the environment, and with all the rolling back of important environmental standards during the Bush administration, the American people need a strong leader to improve things environmentally.  They need an EPA director who is strong on air quality, strong on marine conservation, strong on toxic dumping; not just someone who is strong on climate change.

Climate change is by far the most important issue facing us today, and on this point, Jackson is an excellent choice.  She helped pass the Global Warming Response Act, which dramatically cuts greenhouse gas emissions, and she obviously cares deeply about the issue.  But I have mixed feelings about the choice of Jackson.  I would like to see someone who is strong on a variety of environmental issues, and someone who has not spent their life in government trying to mediate compromise between industry and environmental non-profits.  It’s time to have an advocate for environmental NGOs at the helm of the EPA.  The host of environmental issues facing us today is too serious, and frankly, we’ve waited far too long.

 
Comments (3) Email Link
 
3  Comments
  1. Steve J.
    December 18, 2008 2pm UTC

    Great post! It’s good to see some healthy debate surrounding Obama’s appointments. Frankly, I’m sick of this prolonged “honeymoon period.” We need to make sure that the new administration follows through with far-reaching policy efforts on a variety of environmental fronts. Here’s hoping that Jackson is given a strong mandate and recognizes her vital role in establishing the US as an environmental leader and example to the rest of the world.

  2. Robert Cowin
    December 18, 2008 7pm UTC

    Could not agree with you more Steve J. I like Obama, and am sincerely optimistic about his capacity for leadership, but everyone needs to be judged on their actions, not just their reputation. I’ll give Lisa Jackson the same opportunity, but right now, I don’t see her appointment as a victory for the environmental community.

  3. Bill Wolfe
    January 2, 2009 2pm UTC

    You need to look at Jackson’s record more closely.

    Go to website of the group PEER (@ http://www.peer.org) and read their analysis, it coms from professionals who have worked for and with Jackson and know the inside story that rarely gets out the public and activists. (compare PEER’s analysis to those who support Jackson – focus on the facts, not the spin, and then decide who you think is more credible).

    The NJ Global Warming Response Act is an empty shell – no implementation. No funding, regulations, staff, etc.

 
Leave your comment
 
sadsads
1. Name: (required)
2. Email: (required, but will not be displayed)
3. Comments
Comments are moderated by ecomii, in accordance with ecomii Comment Policy, and may not appear untill they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.
 
4. Type in the characters you see.
    Can't read this? Try another.
Type characters:
 

 
« all ecomii blogs  
  
 
About this blog

Stay current on the latest policies and progress government is making on addressing green issues. Find out what is going on off-camera and in the discussion chambers of government. Advocate your thoughts and ideas.

 Subscribe in a reader

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

 
recent posts
 
other green blogs
 
blog categories