|

As convenient as cars are, each and every one of us has gotten frustrated at the unbearably slow driver in the left lane or the rude driver who refuses to drive any farther than two feet away from your rear bumper.
Unsafe driving practices such as these cause traffic jams, accidents, and deaths every single day on our roads and highways. And what is the root cause behind all of these issues? Humans.
Google, the company behind some of the most influential technological innovations of the past decade, is committed to creating the safest, most practical, eco friendly car of the future: the driverless car.
In his 2010 TEDtalk entitled “Rethinking the Automobile,” Sebastian Thrun, head of Google’s Driverless Cars project, describes a world where computer-driven cars actively reduce emissions, decongest traffic, save money on gas, and most importantly, save lives.
The project, using the eco friendly Prius, has advanced to a point where on the road tests are successfully taking place (accident-free too), but there is room for debate on how feasible these cars actually are in real life.
The inherent problem with driverless cars is that they have to interact, and react, to human-driven cars presently on the roadway. How can a driverless car replace sheer human intuition and react to the ever-changing environment on our roadways? Moreover, can Google create a system that eliminates any chance for a driverless car to get into an accident?
Needless to say, the courts will also have a lot on their plates if, and when, this technology comes into fruition. Will all of the blame be placed on actual drivers in the case of an accident with a driverless car, or will faulty technology end up being the scapegoat in some cases?
The benefits of functional driverless cars are abundant, but the reality is that Google, as well as those who govern our roadways, have a long way to go before we can abandon the control of driving cars ourselves and let computers take the wheel.
Earthgarage – Greener Car. Fatter Wallet.
More from ecomii:
|
I think driver less cars would take all the fun out of owning a car. We would all have the same tub just to get where we might be going.
as the technology refines more changes will be done and the product will be more better..
Bob Leonard is the founder and CEO of Earthgarage
http://vbcsharpdeveloper.blogspot.com
If you wish to purchase a yard truck there are several things that you will need to consider before purchasing that truck. There are many things to consider when purchasing a Terminal Tractor and you will have to make sure that you purchase the correct type of commercial truck and for the right price
We have Expert girls that know about Terminal Tractor , they can give you critical information the must know before you make purchase, they can also help you compared through model compareson lean the main difference between terminal tractor by top OEM.
Autocar Trucks have gained a lot of reputation in the world as a custom engineering service provider. They help a lot to make the work much easier for the people who are engaging in businesses. Because of this reason, the autocar trucks are popular in every corner of the world. in order find the perfect autocar for you call you dealer now.
Take a unique look at the manufacturing process for autocar terminal tractor with this you can properly speck your truck anytime, the website provides video’s the must know before buy a terminal truck
Driverless cars mean bad news for driving instructors like myself… pretty soon we’ll probably be doing our lessons on Playstation!!
While a great idea, I don’t think we are that close to driverless cars becoming a reality for a number of reasons. it would impact many people in the auto industry such as driving instructors, etc. Also, I don’t think people will be that trusting of these vehicles.
Electric car is the future, because petrol & diesel cars can be too expensive to drive in the near future.
http://www.camarocarplace.com
That would be me. Someone just asked me if my car and bike were on the chive, and I had no idea this site existed. Came here and lokeod through a few albums, truly made my day to see this. Since this picture was taken, I changed a few things with the Camaro. It’s a bit lower and on Prostars now. The bike remains the same. I’m really curious where the picture was seen before submitted here..
zUd166 bwjuplnxzahr
I held out for 8% on my latest startup, but then again I am a seasoned entrepreneur, not just a regular first hire. I actually met with the Founder and investors beforehand and the investor had the nerve to say that if I wanted equity I should pony up money. This blew my mind, how is a massive salary cut (about $80k) not ponying up money? Yes, there is the fact that I have the option to bow out at any time, but I get exactly nothing if no shares have vested. Luckily the Founder saw my value and agreed to my terms. The problem with giving away equity is that too many people aren’t motivated by it. I am very motivated by equity, and the Founder knew this from my past ventures. The truth is that most developers just aren’t that motivated by equity. When I founded a company 7 years ago and raised $500k I gave my first developer 2% and a salary maybe 25% less than what he might command otherwise. But he was right out of school, and this was an incredibly opportunity for him to learn about startups and get some excellent experience on a variety of technologies. The equity didn’t motivate him though, and he eventually left to make more money. That is very often the case (I have several more examples), so I don’t think you can’t be too hard on founders that are stingy with options. If you want the options then you need to command them. If you don’t get what you are worth then it isn’t the right choice.
auto insurance quotes