|

Coal conjures up images of bygone times, when men wore top hats and women wore corsets. But nothing could be farther from the truth. Today, coal is as big a business as it ever was. A few statistics underscore this reality:
* 52% of American electricity is generated by coal-fired power plants;
* Americans consume more than 1 billion tons of coal a year;
* Coal shipments make up half of all rail traffic in the U.S.
Coal is also responsible for a large chunk of worldwide carbon emissions and in this carbon-constrained world, this is an issue that power companies and coal companies know they can’t ignore.
One solution is clean coal. The theory is simple and extremely appealing: Transform dirty coal into a clean, carbon-free fuel by capturing the carbon dioxide that it emits, compressing that carbon, and piping it deep underground for permanent storage.
Utilities like Ohio-based American Electric Power (AEP), one of the country’s largest power generators and coal consumers, has been a strong supporter of clean coal. In the summer of 2007, AEP, along with other power companies and coal companies, launched a major advertising campaign stressing their commitment to clean coal. But – as the ad claims – while clean coal might be « America’s Power, » the technology itself remains years away from becoming a reality.
For one, it is very expensive. In fact, it is estimated that clean coal power plants would cost 20% to 30% more to run than traditional coal-fired plants. Another issue is geology. Not every power plant is close to suitable storage sites. So, while areas like Wyoming or Appalachia are geologically suitable, New England, for example, is not, as any plants located there would have to pipe their carbon emissions to far away storage sites. This would require the construction of massive and costly pipeline networks - an undertaking not easily committed to by coal companies suffering similarly to other companies in a newly restrictive world of credit.
However, despite any such deterrents to this sort of capital expenditure, as David Ratcliffe, CEO of Southern Company, bluntly admitted in a recent interview with the Frontline television newsmagazine, his industry will “have a hard time in a carbon-constrained future burning coal without the ability to capture CO2.” After AEP, Southern Company is the country’s second largest producer of CO2. Clearly, the ability to capture carbon is crucial if these companies have any hope of growth in a newly green world.
Click here to learn more about the Cap and Trade system.
|
Really interesting. I hate to admit that I was one of the people who was slightly swayed by the ad campaigns. I just didn’t know much about clean coal…and have to admit I still don’t understand how the process works. What happens to all the CO2 when it’s underground? Is it like radiactive waste, where we can just hope it doesn’t escape?
Let the carbon dioxide escape into the air. It will help agriculture by making the plants grow better. Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant from coal. Sulphur and particulate matter is the pollutant. Pump carbon dioxide underground. That is idiotic.
Read about the hacked emails (CLIMATE-GATE) that talk about suppressing the true scientists who know this carbon dioxide non sense is just an excuse to tax AND LIMIT OUR ENERGY CONSUMPTION and turn us all into surfs and usher in world dictatorship.
Plants breathe carbon dioxide and it is no more a pollutant than oxygen. This is something that the dumbed down present day Americans apparently cant even wrap their minds around but something any 5th Grader knew just a few years ago. If anything this planet is carbon dioxide starved,not in excess of it.
You can bet AL WHORE and the other elitists who are telling you to cut back on your carbon emissions in the way of driving,home heating,air conditioning,limiting home size,etc..wont be doing any such things themselves.
I will also make sure I stay clear of this idiot site in the future since its clearly supported by BIG BROTHER and is just a mouthpiece for the phony environmental movement. This movement should go after real pollution like toxic waste instead of carbon dioxide but its all bought and payed for by Rockefeller Grants.